- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-540/23: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Sandhold v EUIPO – Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis (PATAPOUF)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0540
62023TA0540
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2951
6.5.2024
(Case T-540/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark PATAPOUF - Earlier EU word mark PATA NEGRA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/2951)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sandhold BV (Leiden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Spiegeler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis, SA (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 2553/2022-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 223, 23.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2951/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *