- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 June 2010. # Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission. # Appeal - State aid - Application for aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking and notified to the Commission after the investment project had been fully completed - Criteria of the incentive effect and of necessity. # Case C-117/09 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:370
62009CO0117
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑117/09 P)
Appeal – State aid – Application for aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking and notified to the Commission after the investment project had been carried out in full – Criteria of incentive effect and of necessity
3. Appeal – Grounds – Inadequate or contradictory grounds – Admissibility (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 52)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2009 in Case T‑162/06 Kronoply v Commission by which the Court dismissed the application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/262/EC of 21 September 2005 declaring State aid which Germany is planning to implement for the appellant to be incompatible with the common market (OJ 2006 L 94, p. 50) – Proposed aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking notified to the Commission after the investment project had been carried out in full by means of the aid initially approved – Incorrect assessment of the incentive effect and of the necessity of the aid at issue.
Operative part:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.