- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-411/18: Action brought on 13 December 2019 – WM v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0411
62018TN0411
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.2.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 61/47
—
(Case T-411/18)
(2020/C 61/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WM (represented by: B. Entringer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the selection board of 27 September 2017 in open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 not to include the applicant on the reserve list;
—annul the decision of the appointing authority of 19 April 2018 rejecting complaint No R/75/17;
—award the applicant an amount of no less than EUR 25 000 in damages;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment related to employment and occupation.
—The applicant refers to Article 5 of Directive 2000/78, (1) and to Article 1d of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, in support of his plea, and argues that the defendant failed to undertake the required individual assessment of the applicant’s needs.
Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).
—