- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-180/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Stoilov i Ko EOOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna (Request for a preliminary ruling — Legal basis of the decision at issue in the main proceedings no longer present — Lack of relevance of the questions asked — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0180
62012CA0180
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.12.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 367/11
(Case C-180/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Request for a preliminary ruling - Legal basis of the decision at issue in the main proceedings no longer present - Lack of relevance of the questions asked - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 367/17
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Stoilov i Ko EOOD
Defendant: Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008, amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2008 L 291, p. 1) and Council Regulation No (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992, establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) as well as Articles 41(2)(a) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Tariff classification of goods — Classification of goods (materials for the manufacture of awnings) under heading 5407 61 30 on account of its characteristics as ‘woven fabric’ or under heading 6303 92 10 on account of their sole intended purpose as ‘interior blinds’ — Enforcement order of a Member State requiring payment of a customs duty supplement and VAT after the findings in an expert's report of the customs laboratory — Protection of legitimate expectation in light of the circumstances of the filing of the customs declaration
Operative part of the judgment
There is no need to answer the questions raised by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria).
*
Language of the case: Bulgarian.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.