- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/22: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (doglover) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark doglover — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0231
62022TB0231
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/40
(Case T-231/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark doglover - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 24/55)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Growth Finance Plus AG (Gommiswald, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and T. Klee, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 February 2022 (Case R 720/2020-5).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Growth Finance Plus AG shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.