EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-420/13: Action brought on 14 August 2013 — Brouillard v Court of Justice

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0420

62013TN0420

January 1, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/34

(Case T-420/13)

2013/C 325/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alain Laurent Brouillard (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-M. Gouazé, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the General Court to:

annul the decision of 5 June 2013 of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Directorate-General for Translation — concerning contract 2013/S 047-075037, eliminating Mr Brouillard from the lot for translation into French;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision to invite the candidate selected to tender in the context of a negotiated tender procedure relating to the conclusion of framework contracts for the translation of legal texts from certain official languages of the European Union into French (OJ 2013/S 47-075037) to submit a tender in which it is confirmed that the applicant will not be engaged in providing the services concerned on the ground that the applicant does not fulfil the full legal education requirement.

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:

1.The first plea in law, alleging lack of competence of the authority which adopted the contested act.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Directives 2000/78/EC (1) and 2005/36/EC (2) and the case-law of the Court of Justice.

3.Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment concerning the applicant's academic and professional qualifications.

(1) Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

(2) Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia