- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-114/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Bowles, Larue and Whitehead v ECB (Staff case — Staff of the ECB — General adjustment to salaries — Method of calculation — Provisional data — Economic and financial crisis — Special circumstances — Act adversely affecting an official — Pay slip — Provisional act)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FA0114
62010FA0114
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.5.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/26
(Case F-114/10) (1)
(Staff case - Staff of the ECB - General adjustment to salaries - Method of calculation - Provisional data - Economic and financial crisis - Special circumstances - Act adversely affecting an official - Pay slip - Provisional act)
(2012/C 138/53)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Carlos Bowles, Emmanuel Larue and Sarah Whitehead (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Carlini and M. López Torres, Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of the applicants’ salary slips for January 2010 and the following months in so far as they apply a salary increase of 2 % as a result of the 2010 salary adjustment procedure and compensation for the material loss suffered by the applicants
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decisions of the European Central Bank to increase by 2 % the remuneration of C. Bowles, E. Larue and S. Whitehead from 1 January 2010, as stated on their salary slips for January 2010 and the following months;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the European Central Bank to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 55, 19.2.2011, p. 37.