- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-424/22, Santander Bank Polska: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie – Poland) – WN v Santander Bank Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 6(1) and 7(1) – Effects of a declaration that a term is unfair – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms concerning the valuation and the rate of exchange – Nullity of that agreement – Restitutory effects – Right of retention)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0424
62022CB0424
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4073
(Case C-424/22,
Santander Bank Polska)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Articles 6(1) and 7(1) - Effects of a declaration that a term is unfair - Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms concerning the valuation and the rate of exchange - Nullity of that agreement - Restitutory effects - Right of retention)
(C/2024/4073)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: WN
Defendant: Santander Bank Polska S.A.
Operative part of the order
Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts,
must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a judicial interpretation of national law according to which, in the context of the cancellation of a mortgage loan agreement concluded with a consumer by a banking institution, by reason of some unfair terms in that contract, the reliance, by that institution, on a right of retention means that the possibility for that consumer to obtain the payment of amounts which that institution is ordered to pay as a result of the restitutory effects of the declaration that those terms were unfair is conditional on the concomitant offer of that consumer to repay or guarantee the repayment of all the sums that he or she received from that institution under that contract, irrespective of the repayments already made in performance of that contract.
—
Date lodged: 27.6.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4073/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
* Language of the case: Polish.