- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 March 2007. # Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA and Cray Valley Iberica SA v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Directive 67/548/EEC - Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy - Action for damages - Appeal clearly unfounded. # Case C-150/06 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2007:164
62006CO0150
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑150/06 P)
Appeal – Directive 67/548/EEC – Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy – Action for damages – Appeal clearly unfounded
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2005 in Case T-369/03 Arizona Chemical and Others v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance declared inadmissible an action for annulment of Commission Decision D(2003)430245 of 20 August 2003, rejecting the applicant’s request to withdraw rosin from the list of dangerous substances set out in Annex I to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ, English Special Edition 1967, p. 234).
Operative part
The appeal is dismissed.
Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA and Cray Valley Iberica SA shall bear the costs.