EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-730/19: Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — CR and CT v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0730

62019TB0730

January 4, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.3.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/41

(Case T-730/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Economic and monetary policy - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: CR, CT (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, A. Lefterov and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s assessment of 15 August 2019 in which it found that PNB Banka AS was failing or likely to fail within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia.

3.CR and CT shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene.

4.CR and CT, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

Language of the case: English.

(1)

OJ C 27, 27.1.2020

* * *

(1) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia