I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-730/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Economic and monetary policy - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 119/57)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: CR, CT (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, A. Lefterov and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s assessment of 15 August 2019 in which it found that PNB Banka AS was failing or likely to fail within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia.
3.CR and CT shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene.
4.CR and CT, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.
Language of the case: English.
(1)
OJ C 27, 27.1.2020
* * *
(1) Language of the case: English.