I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark LA MER – Earlier national word mark LABORATOIRE DE LA MER – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the mark – Article 43(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 114, 127, 129-130)
Re:
ACTION for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2003 (Case R 814/2000‑2) relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratoires Goëmar and La Mer Technology, Inc.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark LA MER for goods in Class 3
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Laboratoires Goëmar
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
International and national word mark LABORATOIRE DE LA MER for goods in Classes 3, 5, 29 and 31
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld. Application for registration dismissed in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders La Mer Technology, Inc. to pay its own costs and those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Laboratoires Goëmar.