- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-23/18: Action brought on 19 January 2018 — Nova Brands v EUIPO — Natamil (Natamil)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0023
62018TN0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.3.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 94/31
(Case T-23/18)
(2018/C 094/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Nova Brands SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Wellens, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Natamil GmbH (Munich, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘natamil’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 235 069
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2017 in Case R 1910/2016-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU concerning the obligation to state reasons.