- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-331/18: Action brought on 31 May 2018 — Szécsi and Somossy v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0331
62018TN0331
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-331/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: István Szécsi (Szeged, Hungary) and Nóra Somossy (Szeged) (represented by: D. Lazar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—order the defendant to pay to the applicants HUF 38330542,83 in compensation;
—order the defendant to pay to the applicants interest on the principal claim from 20 April 2016 at the rate of 11,95 % per annum;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The action is based on the following plea.
The applicants claim that the Commission wrongfully breached its duty of supervision under Article 17 TEU, in so far as it failed to take any appropriate measures to ensure that Article 13 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and the relevant Hungarian implementing legislation were applied by the Hungarian courts.
* Language of the case: German.
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).