EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-610/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2025 – Hamster Polska v EUIPO – Budotechnika (Public toilets) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing public toilets – Grounds for invalidity – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of earlier designs – Degree of freedom of the designer – Informed user – Different overall impression – Articles 5 to 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0610

62023TA0610

March 26, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/2531

12.5.2025

(Case T-610/23)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing public toilets - Grounds for invalidity - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Disclosure of earlier designs - Degree of freedom of the designer - Informed user - Different overall impression - Articles 5 to 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

(C/2025/2531)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Hamster Polska sp. z o.o. (Rybnik, Poland) (represented by: A. Szczurek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and M. Chylińska, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Budotechnika sp. z o.o. (Pilchowice, Poland) (represented by: A. Pilecka and M. Witkowska, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 August 2023 (Case R 15/2023-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Hamster Polska sp. z o.o. to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court.

(1) OJ C C/2023/779, 20.11.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2531/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia