- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-212/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — Apple v EUIPO (Styluses)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0212
62019TN0212
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.5.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 182/39
(Case T-212/19)
(2019/C 182/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Design: Application for registration No 3012707 -0004
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 January 2019 in Case R 2533/2017-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 11(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 in conjunction with Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 in conjunction with Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.