- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-510/09: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — V v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Refusal of appointment on grounds of failure to meet physical fitness requirements necessary for the performance of the functions — Duty on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0510
62009TA0510
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.7.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 219/14
(Case T-510/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Recruitment - Refusal of appointment on grounds of failure to meet physical fitness requirements necessary for the performance of the functions - Duty on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)
2011/C 219/18
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: V (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curral and D. Martin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission ECR II-0000 seeking the annulment of that judgment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission to the extent that the Civil Service Tribunal omitted to rule on a plea in law raised by Ms V at the hearing, alleging that the president of the medical committee was not enrolled in the Belgian Medical Association;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;
3.Dismisses the action brought by Ms V before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-33/08;
4.Orders Ms V to bear her own costs and those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance. Further orders the costs incurred at first instance, in the case which gave rise to the judgment in V v Commission, to be borne in accordance with the ruling given in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the operative part thereof.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.