- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-274/23: Action brought on 19 May 2023 — Karadeniz v EUIPO — Cakmakci (Acapulco)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0274
62023TN0274
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 235/73
(Case T-274/23)
(2023/C 235/87)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Taha Karadeniz (Dinslaken, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ayhan Cakmakci (Bochum, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Acapulco’ — EU trade mark No 18 125 766
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2023 in Case R 691/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.