- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-442/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0442
62020TN0442
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.9.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 297/46
(Case T-442/20)
(2020/C 297/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Isaline Grangé (Edegem, Belgium) and Alizée Van Strydonck (Strombeek-Bever, Belgium) (represented by: M. De Vroey, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nema Srl (San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Applicants before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark âme — Application for registration No 17 895 139
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2020 in Case R 2960/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and any intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.