I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-57/01) (<a id="ntc1-C_2010037EN.01003101-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2010037EN.01003101-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>
(Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Market in soda ash in the Community (with the exception of the United Kingdom and Ireland) - Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC - Supply agreements for an excessively long period - Fidelity rebate - Expiry of limitation period applicable to Commission power to impose fines or sanctions - Reasonable time - Essential procedural requirements - Relevant geographic market - Existence of a dominant position - Abuse of a dominant position - Right of access to the file - Fine - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Aggravating circumstances - Repetition of infringement - Mitigating circumstances)
2010/C 37/38
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Solvay SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Simont, P.-A. Foriers, G. Block, F. Louis and A. Vallery, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and J. Currall, Agents, assisted by N. Coutrelis, lawyer)
First, application for annulment of Commission Decision 2003/6/EC of 13 December 2000 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 [EC] (Case COMP/33.133 — C: Soda ash — Solvay) (<a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:L:2003:010:TOC">OJ 2003 L 10, p. 10</a>) and, in the alternative, application for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.
The Court:
1.Fixes the fine imposed on Solvay SA in Article 2 of Commission Decision 2003/6/EC of 13 December 2000 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 [EC] (Case COMP/33.133 — C: Soda ash — Solvay) at EUR 19 million;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder.
(<span class="super">1</span>) <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2001:161:TOC">OJ C 161, 2.6.2001</a>.