- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-123/24, Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo – Bulgaria) – UO v Predsedatel na Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0123
62024CB0123
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7299
16.12.2024
(Case C-123/24, (1) Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation of national law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7299)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: UO
Defendant: Predsedatel na Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove
Operative part of the order
1.The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the second question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Administrative Court, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria), by decision of 2 February 2024.
2.The request for preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Administrative Court, Veliko Tarnovo) is manifestly inadmissible as regards the first question referred by that court.
—
Date lodged: 14.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7299/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *