- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-119/23: Action brought on 3 March 2023 — Insider v EUIPO — Alaj (in Insajderi)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0119
62023TN0119
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/66
(Case T-119/23)
(2023/C 155/83)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Insider LLC (Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo) (represented by: M. Ketler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Florim Alaj (Zug, Switzerland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in Insajderi — Application for registration No 18 255 587
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 December 2022 in Case R 1152/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court for the purposes of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Violations of procedural rules regarding the proceedings before EUIPO;
—Infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.