- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-105/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Lübking and Others v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion exercise — New career structure — Extension of career by the introduction of new grades with no equivalents in the old Staff Regulations — Application of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and the GIP applicable with effect from 2005 — Principle of equal treatment — Retroactive effect of promotion decisions to a date prior to 1 May 2004 — Transitional measures — Action manifestly bound to fail)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006FB0105
62006FB0105
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/38
(Case F-105/06) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Officials - Promotion - 2005 promotion exercise - New career structure - Extension of career by the introduction of new grades with no equivalents in the old Staff Regulations - Application of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and the GIP applicable with effect from 2005 - Principle of equal treatment - Retroactive effect of promotion decisions to a date prior to 1 May 2004 - Transitional measures - Action manifestly bound to fail)
2011/C 340/78
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Johannes Lübking and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented: initially by M. Simm and B. Driessen, and subsequently by M. Bauer, J. Monteiro and K. Zieleśkiewicz, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Commission’s decision published in Administrative Notices No 85 2005 of 23 November 2005 in so far as it provided for promotion of the applicants to grade A*9 and not grade A*10 in the 2005 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the order
1.The application is dismissed.
2.The applicants and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.
3.The Council of the European Union, the intervener, shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 281 of 18.11.06, p. 45.
* * *