I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
10.3.2025
(Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Right to effective judicial protection - Plea of illegality)
(C/2025/1420)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: UniCredit Bank GmbH, formerly UniCredit Bank AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: F. Schäfer, H. Großerichter, F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, C. Flynn and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by G. Coppo and K. Bongs, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Bauerschmidt, J. Haunold and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders UniCredit Bank GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB);
3.Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.
*
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1420/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—