I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-581/17)
(2017/C 374/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Asics Corporation (Kobe, Japan) (represented by: M. Polo Carreño, M. Granado Carpenter, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Van Lieshout textiel Agenturen BV (Berkel-Enschot, The Netherlands)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of four crossing lines) — Application for registration No 11 952 678
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2017 in Case R 2129/2016-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the reimbursement of its costs in this appeal before the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Breach of the duty of the Board to revise the legality of the first instance decision;
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.