- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-654/21: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2022 — Eurecna v Commission (Action for annulment — Public supply contracts — EDF — ‘Territorial strategies for innovation (TSI)’ contract — OLAF investigation — Registration in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) database — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0654
62021TB0654
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/40
(Case T-654/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Public supply contracts - EDF - ‘Territorial strategies for innovation (TSI)’ contract - OLAF investigation - Registration in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) database - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 284/53)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Eurecna SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented by: R. Sciaudone, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and F. Moro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision of 28 July 2021 to register the applicant in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) database, pursuant to Article 135(1) to (3) and Article 142(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Eurecna SpA shall pay the costs.
Language of the case: Italian.
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.