I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 161/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: EM Research Organization, Inc. (Okinawa, Japan) (represented by: J. Liesegang, M. Jost and N. Lang, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Christoph Fischer GmbH (Stephanskirchen, Germany), Ole Weinkath (Hünxe-Drevenack, Germany), Multikraft Produktions- und Handels GmbH (Pichl/Wels, Austria), Phytodor AG (Buochs, Switzerland)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: International word mark ‘EM’ — No 2 829 851
Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 in Case R 2442/2015-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 145 and the first sentence of Article 57(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.