- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-363/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2016 — Secolux v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a call for tenders for a public services contract — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the privacy and integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Partial access — Overriding public interest — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0363
62014TA0363
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.11.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 410/10
(Case T-363/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a call for tenders for a public services contract - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the privacy and integrity of the individual - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Partial access - Overriding public interest - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 410/12)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Secolux, Association pour le contrôle de la sécurité de la construction (Capellen, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Prüm-Carré and E. Billot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 1 and 14 April 2014 refusing to grant the applicant full access to certain documents relating to a call for tenders under reference number 02/2013/OIL and to safety checks to be carried out in various buildings in Luxembourg (OJ 2013/S 156-271471).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Secolux, Association pour le contrôle de la sécurité de la construction, to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.