- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-38/16: Action brought on 28 January 2016 — EEB v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0038
62016TN0038
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.4.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 118/34
(Case T-38/16)
(2016/C 118/38)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Commission of 19 November 2015 with reference Ares(2015)5212500 confirming its decision of 14 September 2015 with reference Ares(2015)3790389 in which the Commission took an additional decision on the request for information of 3 February 2015, submitted by the EEB; and
—order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error as to the determination of the subject-matter of the initial application and, consecutively, infringement of the Commission’s obligation to give the said application a full examination and infringement of the Articles 6(2), 7 and 8 of Regulation 1049/2001.
2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the duty to state reasons.