- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-484/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam), PG, GF v Institut national de l’audiovisuel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Exclusive rights of performers — Article 2(b) — Reproduction right — Article 3(2)(a) — Making available to the public — Authorisation — Presumption — National scheme exempting a public institution responsible for the conservation and promotion of the national audiovisual heritage from the requirement to obtain the performer’s written consent for the exploitation of archives containing fixations of that performer’s performances)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0484
62018CA0484
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 10/16
(Case C-484/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Exclusive rights of performers - Article 2(b) - Reproduction right - Article 3(2)(a) - Making available to the public - Authorisation - Presumption - National scheme exempting a public institution responsible for the conservation and promotion of the national audiovisual heritage from the requirement to obtain the performer’s written consent for the exploitation of archives containing fixations of that performer’s performances)
(2020/C 10/18)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam), PG, GF
Defendant: Institut national de l’audiovisuel
Interveners: Syndicat indépendant des artistes-interprètes (SIA-UNSA), Syndicat français des artistes-interprètes (CGT)
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(b) and Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which establishes, as regards the exploitation of audiovisual archives by a body set up for that purpose, a rebuttable presumption that the performer has authorised the fixation and exploitation of his performances, where that performer is involved in the recording of an audiovisual work so that it may be broadcast.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
* * *