- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-771/22: Order of the General Court of 20 June 2023 — NO v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Irish legal sector — Payment of the fees of a client’s former solicitor by that client’s new solicitor — Rejection of a complaint — Decision finding that there is no State aid — State resources — Manifest inadmissibility in part — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0771
62022TB0771
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 278/22
(Case T-771/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Irish legal sector - Payment of the fees of a client’s former solicitor by that client’s new solicitor - Rejection of a complaint - Decision finding that there is no State aid - State resources - Manifest inadmissibility in part - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 278/34)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: NO (represented by: E. Smartt, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission, (represented by: I. Barcew and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant asks the General Court to annul the decision of the European Commission of 27 September 2022 rejecting his complaint of 12 September 2022.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
2.NO is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.