I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Officials - Retirement pension - The 2004 and 2014 reforms of the Staff Regulations - Transitional measures relating to certain details in the calculation of pension rights - Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Members of the temporary staff who have become officials - Annual rate of acquisition of pension rights - Retirement age - Scope of the law - Equal treatment)
(C/2025/4454)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: UV, UW, UY, UZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Baeckelmans, M. Brauhoff and G. Niddam, Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Bukšek Tomac and M. Mão Cheia Carreira, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and X. Chamodraka, Agents)
By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 28 June 2023 rejecting their requests for the application of Articles 21 and 22 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for the purposes of determining their retirement age and the annual rate of acquisition of their pension rights.
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders UV, UW, UY and UZ to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/3803, 24.6.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4454/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—