- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-706/20: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2022 — MiMedx Group v EUIPO — DIZG (Epiflex) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0706
62020TB0706
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/27
(Case T-706/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 71/36)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: MiMedx Group, Inc. (Marietta, Georgia, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Bosse and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: DIZG Deutsches Institut für Zell- und Gewebeersatz gGmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Plesser and R. Heine, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 September 2020 (Case R 133/2020-2).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.MiMedx Group, Inc. and DIZG Deutsches Institut für Zell- und Gewebeersatz gGmbH shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: German
* * *
(1) OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.