I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-154/19) (*)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Mission expenses - Act not open to challenge - Act not adversely affecting an official - Irregular nature of the pre-litigation procedure - Premature action - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 61/53)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)
Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the part of the decision of 30 November 2018 by which the EEAS Appointing Authority rejected the applicant’s complaint of 27 July 2018, inasmuch as it implicitly refused the request concerning mission expenses submitted by the applicant on 26 February 2018.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.ZU shall pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.