- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-3/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. — Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Central purchasing bodies — Small municipalities — Restriction to only two organisational models for the central purchasing bodies — Prohibition of use of a central purchasing body under private law and with the participation of private entities — Territorial restriction of the activity of central purchasing bodies)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0003
62019CA0003
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 262/5
(Case C-3/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2004/18/EC - Central purchasing bodies - Small municipalities - Restriction to only two organisational models for the central purchasing bodies - Prohibition of use of a central purchasing body under private law and with the participation of private entities - Territorial restriction of the activity of central purchasing bodies)
(2020/C 262/07)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Asmel societá consortile a r.l.
Defendant: A.N.A.C. — Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione
Intervener: Associazione Nazionale Aziende Concessionarie Servizi entrate (Anacap)
Operative part of the judgment
1.Articles 1(10) and 11 of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1336/2013 of 13 December 2013, must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which restricts the organisational autonomy of small local authorities to use a central purchasing body to only two exclusively public organisational models, without the participation of private persons or undertakings.
2.Articles 1(10) and 11 of Directive 2004/18, as amended by Regulation No 1336/2013, must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which limits the scope of action of central purchasing bodies set up by local authorities to the territory of those authorities.
(*)
Language of the case: Italian