I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 73/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark MOULDPRO — EU trade mark No 10 022 317
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2021 in Case R 646/2020-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the application of Mouldpro ApS of 30 January 2018 for cancellation of EU trade mark No 10 022 317;
in the alternative:
—reject the application for cancellation in so far as it covers anything other than hose couplings of plastic (included in Class 17);
in the alternative:
—refer the case back to EUIPO for a further hearing and decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.