EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-22/08: Action brought on 14 January 2008 — Quest Diagnostics v OHIM — ALK-Abelló (DIAQUEST)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0022

62008TN0022

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/29

(Case T-22/08)

(2008/C 92/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Quest Diagnostics Inc. (Teterboro, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ALK-Abelló A/S (Hørsholm, Denmark)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 25 October 2007;

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM dated 11 October 2006; and

order the intervener to bear the costs of the action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: ALK-Abelló A/S

Community trade mark concerned: The Community word mark ‘DIAQUEST’ for goods in classes 1, 5 and 42

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: The Community word marks ‘QUEST DIAGNOSTICS’ for goods and services in classes 5, 10, 16, 35, 39 and 42 — application No 2 402 980 and No 1 958 589

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTRM.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia