- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Act adversely affecting an official — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Request for the reclassification of a contract — Reasonable period — Complaint against the rejection of a compliant — Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty of care)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0135
62011FA0135
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.8.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/44
(Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Act adversely affecting an official - Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Request for the reclassification of a contract - Reasonable period - Complaint against the rejection of a compliant - Article 8 of the CEOS - Duty of care)
2013/C 252/75
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BU (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented: in Case F-135/11, by S. Vincenzo initially, then by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers; in Case F-51/12, by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers, and in Case F-110/12, by T. Jablonski and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew BU’s contract, notified by the letter of 30 May 2011;
2.Dismisses the action in Case F-135/11 as to the remainder;
3.Dismisses the actions in Cases F-51/12 and F-110/12;
4.Orders the European Medicines Agency to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by BU in Cases F-135/11 and F-51/12;
5.Orders BU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency in Case F-110/12.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 24; OJ C 209, 14.7.2012, p. 14; OJ C 379, 8.12.12, p. 34.