- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-232/23, Štíkeľ: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II — Slovakia) — A v B (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment — None — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0232
62023CB0232
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/442
(Case C-232/23, (1) Štíkeľ) (2)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment - None - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/442)
Language of the case: Slovak
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A
Defendant: B
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Okresný súd Bratislava II (District Court Bratislava II, Slovakia), by decision of 12 April 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) Date lodged: 12.4.2023.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/442/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)