EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-560/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TB v ENISA (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Action for annulment – Representation of an institution by one of its agents – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Liability – Non-material damage)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0560

62021TA0560

December 18, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1095

(Case T-560/21)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of application - Action for annulment - Representation of an institution by one of its agents - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of good administration - Liability - Non-material damage)

(C/2025/1095)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TB (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (represented by: C. Chalanouli, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks (i) the annulment, first, of the decision of the Selection Board of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) of 10 November 2020 not to place her name on the list of successful candidates in respect of the post of Head of Unit ‘Executive Director Office’ and, second, in essence, of the decision of the Selection Board of ENISA of 12 January 2021 not to accept her application for the post of Head of Unit ‘Corporate Support Services’, and (ii) compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) not to place TB’s name on the list of successful candidates in respect of the post of Head of Unit ‘Executive Director Office’ (ENISA-TA70-AD-2020-04);

2.Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of ENISA not to accept TB’s application for the post of Head of Unit ‘Corporate Support Services’ (ENISA-TA71-AD-2020-05);

3.Dismisses the remainder of the claims set out in the application;

4.Orders ENISA to pay the costs.

*

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1095/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia