- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-847/19: Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0847
62019TN0847
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.2.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 45/95
(Case T-847/19)
(2020/C 45/81)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: X-cen-tek GmbH & Co. KG (Wardenburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hillers, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Altenloh, Brinck & Co. GmbH & Co. KG (Ennepetal, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark PAX — Application for registration No 16 487 803
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2019 in Case R 2324/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.