- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-206/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 15 May 2020 — VA v Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0206
62020CN0206
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 262/14
(Case C-206/20)
(2020/C 262/18)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: VA
Respondent: Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria
Question referred
Where surrender is sought in order to prosecute a requested person, and where the decision to issue an underlying national arrest warrant (‘NAW’) and the decision to issue a European arrest warrant (‘EAW’) are both taken by a public prosecutor, without any involvement of a Court prior to surrender, does a requested person receive the dual level of protection envisaged by the Court in Bob-Dogi C-241/15, (ECLI:EU:C:2016:385) if:
a)the effect of the NAW is limited to detaining the individual for a maximum of 72 hours for the purpose of bringing him before a Court; and
b)on surrender, it is solely a matter for the Court whether to order release, or to continue detention, in light of all the circumstances of the case?