EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-379/23, Guldbrev: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen – Sweden) – Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 2(c), (d) and (i) – Article 3(1) – Scope – Concept of product – Combined offer consisting of the valuation and purchase of a good)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0379

62023CA0379

December 5, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/513

(Case C-379/23,

Guldbrev)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Unfair commercial practices - Directive 2005/29/EC - Article 2(c), (d) and (i) - Article 3(1) - Scope - Concept of ‘product’ - Combined offer consisting of the valuation and purchase of a good)

(C/2025/513)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Guldbrev AB

Defendant: Konsumentombudsmannen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(c), (d) and (i) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’)

must be interpreted as meaning that the valuation service for goods provided by a trader to a consumer before the purchase of those goods from that consumer, which makes the purchase subject to acceptance of the price determined following that valuation, constitutes, together with that purchase, a ‘product’ within the meaning of those provisions, with the result that practices directly connected with the promotion of that product to consumers come within the scope of that directive.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/513/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(*1) Language of the case: Swedish.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia