EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-507/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Competence ratione temporis — Principle of non-discrimination)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0507

62021CA0507

September 8, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.10.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/22

(Case C-507/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam - Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Competence ratione temporis - Principle of non-discrimination)

(2022/C 408/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Puma SE, Puma United Kingdom Ltd, Puma Nordic AB, Austria Puma Dassler GmbH, Puma Italia Srl, Puma France SAS, Puma Denmark A/S, Puma Iberia SL, Puma Retail AG (represented by: J. Cornelis and E. Vermulst, advocaten)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, G. Luengo and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Puma SE, Puma United Kingdom Ltd, Puma Nordic AB, Austria Puma Dassler GmbH, Puma Italia Srl, Puma France SAS, Puma Denmark A/S, Puma Iberia SL and Puma Retail AG to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia