EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-431/08: Action brought on 1 October 2008 — Bulur Giyim Sanayi ve Ticaret Sirketi v OHIM — Denim (VIGOSS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0431

62008TN0431

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

6.12.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/46

(Case T-431/08)

(2008/C 313/84)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Bulur Giyim Sanayi ve Ticaret Sirketi (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: R. Böhm, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: A V Denim, Inc. (trading as A&V Denim, Inc.) (New York, United States)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 July 2008 in case R 1366/2007-2, insofar as it dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 June 2007 ruling on opposition No B 923 005; and

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VIGOSS’ for goods in classes 14, 18 and 25

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: International trade mark registration No 771 374 of the figurative mark ‘VIGOSS’ for goods in class 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially rejected the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision and dismissed the appeal for the reminder

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to take into account all relevant factors when assessing the likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia