- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-114/16: Action brought on 18 March 2016 — Delfin Wellness v EUIPO — Laher (infrared cabins and saunas)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0114
62016TN0114
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.5.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 165/17
(Case T-114/16)
(2016/C 165/19)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Delfin Wellness GmbH (Leonding, Austria) (represented by: T. Riedler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sabine Laher (Weyer, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 1058812-0001, No 1058812-0002 and No 1058812-0003
Contested decision: Decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 in Cases R 849/2014-3, R 850/2014-3 und R 851/2014-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decisions of the Third Board of Appeal in Cases R 849/2014-3, R 850/2014-3 und R 851/2014-3;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of all the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 64 Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 65[(1)](f) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 65(1)(d) of Regulation No 6/2002.