- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-657/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt D v E (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(g) — Supply of services closely linked to welfare and social security work — Preparation of expert reports on the level of care and support needs — Taxable person appointed by the medical service of a care and support insurance fund — Bodies recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0657
62019CA0657
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 414/15
(Case C-657/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions - Article 132(1)(g) - Supply of services closely linked to welfare and social security work - Preparation of expert reports on the level of care and support needs - Taxable person appointed by the medical service of a care and support insurance fund - Bodies recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing)
(2020/C 414/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Finanzamt D
Defendant: E
Operative part of the judgment
Article 132(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that:
the preparation of expert reports on care and support needs by an independent expert on behalf of the medical service of a care and support insurance fund, which are used by that fund in order to assess the scope of the entitlements to welfare and social security services of persons insured by it, constitutes a supply of services that is closely linked to welfare and social security work in so far as it is essential in order to ensure the proper implementation of transactions in that sector;
that provision does not preclude that expert from being refused recognition as a body devoted to social wellbeing, even though, first, that expert provides his or her services concerning the preparation of expert reports on care and support needs, as a subcontractor, at the request of that medical service which is recognised as such a body, second, the costs of preparing such reports are borne indirectly, on a flat-rate basis, by the care and support insurance fund concerned, and, third, that expert has the possibility, under national law, to conclude a contract relating to the preparation of those reports directly with that fund in order to be entitled to such recognition, but has not made use of that possibility.
(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.