I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 118/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Trajektna luka Split d.d. (Split, Croatia) (represented by: M. Bauer, H. Freund and S. Hankiewicz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision C(2014) 9236 final of 28 November 2014 on case AT.40199 Port of Split;
—order the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the applicant;
—refer the case back to the European Commission for further investigation and renewed decision; and
—take such other or further actions as justice may require.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error in assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint by incorrectly assessing the European Union interest with regard to all three reasons brought forward by the Commission;
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint, in particular failing to take into consideration all relevant matters of law and fact.