EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-671/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2024 – Qualcomm v Commission (Qualcomm – Predation) (Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS baseband chipsets – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Predatory pricing – Competence of the author of the act – Rights of the defence – Definition of the relevant market – Dominant position – Abuse – Reconstruction of prices – Determining the cost benchmark – Price-cost test – No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects – Intention to eliminate a competitor – Objective justification – Calculation of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Additional amount – Unlimited jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0671

62019TA0671

September 18, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6421

(Case T-671/19)

(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for UMTS baseband chipsets - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Predatory pricing - Competence of the author of the act - Rights of the defence - Definition of the relevant market - Dominant position - Abuse - Reconstruction of prices - Determining the cost benchmark - Price-cost test - No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects - Intention to eliminate a competitor - Objective justification - Calculation of the fine - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Value of sales - Additional amount - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(C/2024/6421)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Qualcomm, Inc. (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: M. Davilla, M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato, M. English and A. Kontosakou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, G. Conte, M. Farley and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Nvidia Corp (Dover, Delaware, United States) (represented by: M. Dolmans, lawyer, P. Stuart, Barrister-at-Law and W. Lin, Solicitor)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 5361 final of 18 July 2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39711 – Qualcomm (predation)) or, failing that, the cancellation or reduction of the fine imposed on it in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2019) 5361 final of 18 July 2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39711 – Qualcomm (predation));

2.Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Qualcomm Inc. in Article 2 of that decision, for the infringement it committed, as results from Article 1 of that decision, at EUR 238 732 659,33;

3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

4.Orders Qualcomm to bear nine tenths of its own costs and to pay nine tenths of the European Commission’s costs and to pay all the costs of Nvidia Corp;

5.Orders the Commission to bear one tenth of its own costs and to pay one tenth of Qualcomm’s costs.

* * *

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6421/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

15

JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION

* * *

Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia