EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1/23: Action brought on 4 January 2023 — Enmacc v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0001

62023TN0001

January 4, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.2.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/24

(Case T-1/23)

(2023/C 54/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Enmacc GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. von Bonin, A. Pliego Selie and T. van Helfteren, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision of the Commission of 12 December 2022 to launch the call for tenders by way of a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, not to invite the applicant to participate in the tendering procedure ENER/2022/NP/0041 and to explicitly reject the applicant’s request to be invited to that tender procedure;

in subsidiary order, insofar as the contested decision would not give expression to the Commission’s decision to launch a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice and not to invite the applicant to the tendering procedure ENER/2022/NP/0041, annul that decision; and

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Article 164(5)(f) and Point 11.1(c) of Annex 1 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. (1)

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes the principles of transparency and equal treatment.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision failed to state reasons, in breach of Article 41(2), third indent, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and Article 296(2) TFEU.

(1) OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia