- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-530/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 20 October 2020 — SIA EUROAPTIEKA v Ministru kabinets
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0530
62020CN0530
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.12.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 443/16
(Case C-530/20)
(2020/C 443/17)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: SIA EUROAPTIEKA
Institution which adopted the contested act: Ministru kabinets
Questions referred
1.Must the activities to which the contested provision refers be regarded as advertising of medicinal products within the meaning of Title VIII of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) (‘Advertising’)?
2.Must Article 90 of Directive 2001/83/EC be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which extends the list of prohibited methods of advertising and imposes stricter restrictions than those expressly provided for in Article 90 of that directive?
3.Must the legislation at issue in the main proceedings be considered to restrict advertising of medicinal products in order to encourage the rational use of such products, within the meaning of Article 87(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC?
(1) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67, Special edition in Latvian: Chapter 13 Volume 027 P. 69).